hackers company Let's talk

INDEPENDENT SECURITY CONSULTANCY

Hackers Company Offensive thinking.
Defensive results.

We find vulnerabilities before attackers do.
Web, API and infrastructure security audits that turn
technical risk into a clear plan of action.

Scope your security audit
HUMAN-LED. EVIDENCE-BASED. Know your exposure. Build with confidence. ↓
Clear, agreed scope Manual validation Actionable reporting Remediation & retesting

01 / OUR EXPERTISE

Your attack surface.
Our focus.

From the browser to the backend. Understand where your systems are exposed and what to fix first.

01

Web application
security

Authentication, access control and business logic. We examine how your application behaves beyond the happy path.

Web apps SaaS platforms
02

API security
testing

Go beyond endpoints. Test authorization boundaries, sensitive data exposure and the workflows connecting your services.

REST APIs Integrations
03

Infrastructure
& configuration

Review exposed services, deployment settings and security controls to identify gaps in your infrastructure.

Configuration External exposure
Vulnerability assessment, manual validation and retesting across every agreed scope. Find the right scope

02 / THE APPROACH

Thorough testing.
No black box.

You know what we will test, how we will test it and what you will receive. Every step is agreed before testing begins.

01 / ALIGN

Define the boundaries.

Agree assets, objectives, access, timing and rules of engagement. Written authorization comes first.

02 / ASSESS

Think like an attacker.

Combine structured assessment with manual testing of real workflows. Validate findings within the agreed boundaries.

03 / EXPLAIN

Make the risk clear.

Receive evidence, business impact, severity and concrete remediation steps for every validated finding.

04 / VERIFY

Close the loop.

Recheck remediated findings within the agreed retest window and document what has changed.

Structured around established testing guidance

OWASP WSTG OWASP ASVS OWASP API Security
Coverage is mapped to your scope. An assessment is not a certification.

03 / THE DELIVERABLE

A report your team
can act on.

Clear enough for decision-makers.
Detailed enough for the people shipping the fix.

  • Executive summary and prioritized risk
  • Reproducible evidence for validated findings
  • Practical remediation guidance
  • Coverage, limitations and retest status
hc / SECURITY ASSESSMENT ILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE

HC / DEMO-001

Application security
assessment

Finding summary 05 validated findings
Critical 0
High 2
Medium 2
Low 1
HIGH

Broken object-level authorization

Impact, evidence and a clear path to remediation.

Manual validation / Confirmed
Fictional data. Real reporting structure. 01 / 06

04 / ENGAGEMENTS

The right depth.
For your next step.

Every engagement starts with a scoped, fixed-fee proposal. Pricing and timelines depend on complexity, access and coverage.

FOCUSED REVIEW

A clear starting point.

A targeted assessment of one application, API or specific area of concern.

  • Defined, limited testing scope
  • Validated findings and report
  • Remediation discussion
Discuss a focused review

COMPREHENSIVE AUDIT

See the bigger picture.

Deeper testing across an application and its supporting API or infrastructure.

  • Multiple roles and critical workflows
  • Executive and technical reporting
  • Agreed remediation retest
Scope a full audit

ONGOING ASSURANCE

Keep pace with change.

Repeat assessments around releases, new features and changes to your exposure.

  • Agreed assessment schedule
  • Focused testing of changes
  • Tracking and revalidation of findings
Plan ongoing testing

BEFORE WE BEGIN

Good questions.
Clear answers.

What do you need to start an audit?

An agreed list of assets, testing objectives, relevant test accounts and written authorization. We agree the testing window, exclusions and communication process before any activity begins.

Will testing affect our live systems?

We agree the environment and operational constraints during scoping. A staging environment is preferable when representative. Production testing requires agreed safeguards and stop conditions; no test can be promised to be entirely risk-free.

Do we receive only automated scan results?

No. Automated tools can support coverage, but reported findings are manually reviewed and validated within the agreed scope. The report explains evidence, impact, limitations and remediation.

How are confidential information and retests handled?

NDA terms, data access, handling, retention and deletion are agreed before testing. Retest coverage and timing are specified in the proposal so both teams know what is included.

LET'S GET TO WORK

Know where
you stand.

Tell us what you are building and what you need to protect. Start with a clear scope.

Testing is performed only with explicit written authorization and within an agreed scope.

HACKERS COMPANY / SAMPLE REPORT

ILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE / FICTIONAL DATA

Security assessment

Example SaaS application · HC / DEMO-001

Executive summary

This fictional assessment illustrates the structure of a client deliverable. Five sample findings cover authorization, session controls and configuration. The highest-priority issue allows one test account to access another account's records.

0 Critical 2 High 2 Medium 1 Low

Scope and limitations

Example scope: a staging web application and REST API with two authenticated roles. Source code, denial-of-service testing, social engineering and third-party systems are excluded. Findings represent the tested version and agreed coverage, not a guarantee that all vulnerabilities have been identified.

Prioritized findings

ID Finding Severity Status
HC-01 Broken object-level authorization High Open
HC-02 Missing role enforcement on export High Open
HC-03 Sessions remain valid after logout Medium Open
HC-04 Verbose error responses Medium Open
HC-05 Missing defense-in-depth response header Low Open

HC-01 / Broken object-level authorization

Impact: An authenticated user may view a different tenant's records. The issue crosses a tenant boundary and exposes business data.

Illustrative evidence: Using two authorized test accounts, the assessor requests a record belonging to Account B while authenticated as Account A. The API returns the record instead of denying access. Evidence in a real report would include redacted request and response pairs.

Remediation: Enforce object ownership and tenant authorization on every relevant server-side request. Deny access by default and add regression tests for cross-tenant access.

Retest criteria: Account A can no longer retrieve Account B's record, while legitimate access still succeeds. Repeat checks for equivalent endpoints and roles.

Retest record

Not performed in this demonstration. A client report records the retest date, evidence and status of each agreed finding: resolved, partially resolved, unresolved or not retested.

This sample is illustrative and does not represent an actual client, completed engagement or certification.